Private Equity Funds Vs. Syndications
Let's now hover over the difference between Private Equity funds and Syndications. Some investors may not know the difference between funds and syndications. The purpose of the fund or syndicate is to allow investors to take advantage of tax incentives and passively invest while growing their wealth in the real estate investment field. Real estate syndications and funds are two great entry points into the world of investment real estate, and depending on your investment goals, one might be a better fit.
What makes up a real estate fund or syndication?
Syndication has a general partner or sponsor and a limited partner or investor. Syndication is done on one asset at a time per deal. Funding has time frames and fees can vary widely from syndication to syndication. In addition to one-time and ongoing annual membership fees, this typically includes a personally responsible partner or management team member's 20-80% profit share. The general partner is also responsible for due diligence, acquisitions, transaction and asset management, financing, and communications with limited partners. Limited Partners contribute capital and remain passive unless otherwise stated.
In the case of funds, the main difference from syndication is that funds typically pool resources from all the assets they hold, giving the fund an advantage if an area or asset suffers an unfortunate event. The fund's pooled income can solve the problem without demanding funds from investors. Within the fund, investors contribute capital and remain passive. Investors often don't know what assets are involved before they buy, so having a reputable and competent money management team is of utmost importance. Of course, prices also vary greatly. Funds may have various characteristics that individual syndications do not. A fund can have a collection of assets that can fluctuate according to market cycles, and this diversification can provide investors with some degree of protection rather than exposing them to risk in a single asset.
As with all investments, rewards are often measured by measuring risk. Single syndications may offer greater upside potential, but the risks of single assets are much greater than multi-asset fund structures, and as a result, returns should reflect their risk profile.
What are Filings?
A Filing is a type of document that must be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or other regulatory authority. It also determines the types of investors that can invest in a fund or syndication and includes marketing and advertising. These filings are intended to protect non-accredited investors (those who do not meet the income or wealth requirements set by the SEC are considered non-accredited investors) or the general public with little or no investment experience.
501(b) is an exception that allows a company to raise an unlimited amount of money and sell securities to an unlimited number of accredited investors. However, we do not accept any solicitation or advertising, and the Sponsor only accepts investments from those who have already established meaningful relationships. A 501(c) is an exemption that allows sponsors to market and advertise their offerings. However, all investors must be accredited and Sponsor must take reasonable steps to ensure that all investors are accredited.
Fees and Profit Sharing
In most cases, there will be a profit sharing or stock split between the general partner (GP)/sponsor/manager and the limited partner (LP)/investor. This is usually net income, paid after deducting all costs and returning the investor's capital. Both funds and syndicates have endless possibilities for structures, fees, and profit sharing. Typical fees include, but are not limited to acquisition, disposal, asset management, promotion, surety, and financing. Given the variety of fees and structures, it is difficult to provide typical, reasonable, or normal guidelines. Pay attention to the wording of legal documents and look for fees that are not as obvious as other investments. The higher the fee, the more diluted the profit.
Some companies set post-profit sharing or stock splits higher than high upfront fees. Other companies charge an ongoing asset fee and a smaller back-end percentage. Either way, funds or syndications have pros and cons and can be argued either way. Beware of companies that don't tell you how much they charge up front and hide their fees in subscription agreements.
Investor needs, risk profile, and investment horizon should be considered when deciding whether to invest in a fund or a syndicate. Funds and syndications may have similar applications and similar fees. However, the main difference between the two is usually the single investment exposure of syndication and the diversified fund holdings. As always, there are no guarantees in real estate investing. Always remember the old saying, that if an offer sounds too good to be true, it could happen to be.
Pros & Cons of Real Estate Syndication
Have you ever wondered whether syndication is right for you or not? Real property syndication may be an effective funding structure. Therefore, it is often used in apartments. But there are advantages and disadvantages everywhere. To help you decide, here are the advantages and disadvantages of multifamily complexes:
1. Passive Investing
Real estate syndicates are truly passive investments. They allow you to participate in these large apartments. Unlike partnerships and joint ventures where everyone is "active" and takes more risk, here the only capital is at risk. For example, in a partnership, you may be the one bringing in the capital. You invest the money and someone else runs the business. However, if that deal goes awry, there is still a risk that the lender will pursue you in a lawsuit if something happens to the property. Therefore, investment in a partnership is not considered a truly passive investment. Syndicates are ideal for business owners, lawyers, accountants, programmers, or developers. If you are a high-income earner, you can pass by passively without taking additional risks.
2. Cash Scale / Flow
When you start in real estate (like when I started), many investors buy single-family homes, two-family homes, three-family homes, and small multi-family homes. One of the biggest challenges when working on such a small scale is cash flow.
a) If you are in the private sector, funding is very difficult.
b) Generally, you will not receive interest-only payments. This significantly improves cash flow when implementing value-added plans.
c)On a small scale, the expense ratio is incredibly high.
d) Property management fees alone account for 10–12% of gross income.
Sure, you may have enough capital to buy a single-family home. However, such small-scale work has many drawbacks. Let's say you have a two-family house and the tenant moves out. If that happens, half of the sales will disappear. However, with syndication, you can take full advantage of scaling like this: They purchase much larger properties. Being able to pool the capital with other investors improves stability, cash flow, and predictability.
Also, depending on the type of property, the expense ratio is quite low at 40–50%. Cash flow is the lifeline of real estate investment. So, being able to participate in much larger investments that offer scaling benefits in terms of size is a distinct benefit.
3. Advantages of Tax
Of course, this follows from the preceding point. As you scale, you may gain from something known as price isolation. I named it "Steroid Amortization." They essentially dispose of whatever has nothing to do with the construction or the real assets and write it off properly away to make up for the paper loss. This needs to considerably lessen the tax burden.
As an investor, you need your cash to paint the picture for you. However, you need to do it within the maximum tax greenway. No one wishes to pay more taxes than necessary. Syndication lets you take advantage of incentives along with amortization and different tax deductions, in addition to bonus amortization, to limit the taxes you pay for your funding gains.
Now let's move on to the cons of participating in syndication (yes, there are cons!).
1. Lack of Control
Passive investing in syndications may not be for you if you want to make important decisions about where to invest. Syndications are structured to bring in passive investments—passive capital from investors who want real estate professionals to manage their investments. But if you want to become a real estate expert, you are at a disadvantage when it comes to syndication.
2. Real Estate is Illiquid
This means that you cannot sell your investment tomorrow. Syndications offer 3-, 5-, 7-, or 10-year investments. It depends on the project and what you need to do. In some cases, you may only be able to sell to other shareholders within the syndicate.
It all depends on the store structure and setting. So, if you're looking for an incredibly liquid investment that you can join whenever you want and get out of tomorrow, real estate syndication isn't for you. On the one hand, many prefer the illiquidity of real estate. For this reason, many passive investors prefer to invest in syndicates. They can then put that money into another syndicate.
3. Prerequisites
There are conditions and criteria that someone must meet to invest in a real estate syndicate. Usually, if you have money, you can buy shares in any company you like. However, when investing in real estate syndications, you often need to become an accredited investor first. Therefore, if you do not meet the accredited investor criteria, you will be denied participation in this syndication.
Whether real estate syndication is right for you depends on your goals. However, if you want to control real life with your investments, want to be in and out very quickly, and don't meet the criteria to become an accredited investor, joining syndication may not be the right choice.